Use AI Reviews

Researching infographics for a presentation used to require me to manually extract data points. Now it's a matter of uploading the image and asking a question. The image analysis capabilities, combined with the text-based ones, make research much more efficient.

The visual/multimodal support works well with image analysis. Uploaded a chart, got a summary of the data points within seconds. Using this in combination with text-based follow-up questions within the same chat felt quite seamless.

There is a slight delay in processing image uploads compared to text-based ones. Not a big deal, but noticeable when trying to get through a list of images quickly.

Handle multiple content projects weekly and having one workspace for all of them has been a noticeable productivity boost. No more copying prompts between platforms or losing context mid-task when switching tools.

Fast switching between providers feels instant, not clunky. Model availability indicators show what's online before you commit to a prompt, which prevents wasted time on models that might be temporarily down.

Conversation history could benefit from a pinning or favorites feature. Important threads get buried under newer chats, making it harder to revisit key conversations without scrolling through everything.

We've actually implemented this as the standard AI tool in our department and the consistency has been noticeable. Everyone uses the same set of models and the outputs of the models are comparable. Onboarding new users takes minutes instead of hours.

The centralized workspace implies that everybody on the team uses the same set of models and that the output of the models is consistent. No more fragmented conversations on different channels. The shared interface has definitely streamlined collaboration on AI outputs.

There is no shared chat or collaboration option that allows multiple users to contribute to the same chat. A simple share by link option would be great for teams.

I've been using Use AI for drafting client emails and research reports at work. All models in one platform really helped me optimize my workflow.

Being able to hop back and forth between GPT-4 and Claude Opus without breaking the flow is very helpful. It’s efficient to do tasks faster on one particular model than another.

There could be a little more clarification about the capabilities of each model during onboarding. I had to try several things to figure out which model was better suited for certain tasks.

I have been using this tool for about two months now, and it’s absolutely essential to my work. The capacity to shift between models depending on my task _ to answer a question with gemini, another with analysis through claude, or to write creatively with gpt _ ensures that my output represents high-quality work

Multi-llm access allows flexibility, but it doesn’t overwhelm you with a lot of options to choose from. Model selection through task suggestions guide you in the right direction, according to whether it is writing, coding, researching, or translation tasks. Voice commands respond well to natural speech patterns.

A good onboarding process might include explanations about which models perform which tasks best. Also, it would be great to be able to set up custom workflows or automate regular tasks.

Ran marketing copy through GPT-4 and Claude side by side to see which version resonated better. Use AI made A/B testing ideas effortless, something that used to require switching between three different apps.

Live model comparison lets you run a prompt through multiple models simultaneously and see results side by side. For anyone doing content work, that alone justifies trying this platform out seriously.

There’s no dark mode option yet. Having extended time on such a bright interface will get draining pretty fast, particularly since most of my writing happens late in the evening.

Background briefs on unfamiliar topics were a tedious process. Now, with a single prompt, I get a well-researched summary with key takeaways. use AI's research feature is the starting point for all my new project briefs.

The deep research feature aggregates information from various sources and provides a structured summary with references. The generated text is much more suitable for reading and working with than a chatbot response. It is directly useful.

Source links provided include paywalled sources, which makes the references not very useful. Marking open-source sources would be incredibly valuable.

I often review code using claude opus and then check alternatives with gpt-4. The transitions feel natural, and I am not constantly resetting context.

For coding assistance, the ability to swap between reasoning focused models and faster ones is genuinely helpful. The workspace keeps snippets and explanations together cleanly.

Some model names and versions can be confusing at first, especially when performance differs slightly. Clearer explanations would reduce trial and error.

I have been using this product for three months and it has completely changed my approach to creative projects and problem-solving. The variety of models available to me ensures that I have the right tool for the job.

It has genuinely improved the quality of my work to have the ability to compare the outputs of models in real-time. To have gpt-5, claude, and other advanced models at my fingertips in one clean interface is to eliminate so much friction.

Would be great to see more collaboration tools for use with teams. The organization of the conversation history could be improved with better tagging or folder organization. Occasionally model switching takes a few extra seconds.

Not everyone has time to research which model is best for what. The task-based suggestions take that guesswork out entirely. Just describe what you need and use AI points you in the right direction before you even start typing.

The model suggestions based on task feature also tell you the best model for what you're doing. Wanted help with coding and it recommended a reasoning model. Wanted help with creative writing and it recommended a more creative model. Smart defaults.

The suggestions for models based on a task don't tell you why a certain model was recommended. A brief pop-up with a simple explanation would help users learn over time which model is best for each task.

The ability to have all these models in one place has actually helped me increase my productivity. I no longer have to switch between subscription-based models or browser tabs. Everything I need is here.

The function to jump between various AI models while retaining the context of the conversation is extremely helpful. I can use one model like gpt-4 for research purposes, then jump over to a different model like claude opus for creative writing. The user interface is clean, simple, and fast for all models.

The app needs some work. For example, the voice commands do not always pick up the background sound very well, and I think there should be better history search options.

Honestly one of the best investments for anyone working with ai tools regularly. I use it for everything from marketing content creation to product idea generation.

What impresses me the most is the naturalness of using multiple ai tools in one interface without any cognitive burden of remembering logins and interfaces. The voice commands are consistent across all models.

The mobile app is missing some features of the desktop version. The response time of customer support could be improved. I would like more flexibility in model parameters for power users.

i've been using it for composing emails to clients and structuring my notes, and to be honest, it's been a game-changer. having everything in one place just makes the entire process much less chaotic.

the model selection by task feature is very clean - i can choose gemini for a quick overview and gpt-4 for a detailed analysis. the entire workspace is very organized and runs very smoothly.

would be great if there were keyboard shortcuts for model switching - that would be a nice addition.

A good option for professionals who require diversity in their AI tools. i personally use it for document writing and research digest preparation, which it does adequately.

The most notable thing is the multi-llm access, which gives me the flexibility to pick the most suitable model for a particular task. I like the clean interface and the fact that I can switch models in the middle of a conversation without losing context.

Interface can be a bit overwhelming at first with the number of models available. Some models perform better than their native counterparts. The quarterly subscription discount isn’t that substantial. More keyboard shortcuts would be helpful.

This covers about 80% of the AI tasks that need to be done on a day-to-day basis. The interface is clean. The small issues that exist don’t really impact the experience. Worth using as the main tool even if it still needs a bit of polishing.

The unified assistant interface has an excellent set of models. The switching between them is smooth. Most tasks, from summarization to coding assistance, get taken care of quickly. The layout is clean and has everything accessible without needing to click around more.

Sometimes the model selection defaults to the default option after refreshing the webpage. Being able to select the last used model would remove one small annoyance.

Before switching to Use AI, I was handling three different subscriptions: ChatGPT Plus, Claude Pro, and Gemini Advanced. Combining everything into one subscription saved money and reduced the hassle of switching platforms.

Now that I have both GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek under the same roof, separate logins and billing became redundant. Having one interface helps keep things streamlined while allowing me to use whatever model I prefer based on the task at hand.

Price comparison between this platform and individual subscriptions could be displayed more clearly. Had to do my own math to confirm savings, which isn't hard but would be nice to see upfront.

I use this across writing, brainstorming, and quick research checks. It quietly supports my workflow without demanding constant attention.

Model selection by task reduces decision fatigue, especially on busy days. The interface stays responsive and uncluttered even with longer conversations.

There are moments when advanced settings feel buried. Surfacing them more clearly could help power users.

I bounce between gemini 2 and gpt 4 when drafting campaigns. Use AI lets me do that smoothly, which saves time and keeps ideas flowing.

Use AI stands out for letting me move between providers without losing context. Multi-LLM access feels practical rather than overwhelming once you get used to it.

Some features are powerful but not immediately obvious. A short guided tour would help users reach value faster.

Started using this about a month ago, and it has now become my default for just about any AI-related task. The ability to test prompts across multiple models helps me determine which works best for various kinds of work.

The best feature is probably the multi-llm access-you're not locked into one company's models. Voice-enabled commands allow you to go hands-free on calls. The interface will not get in your way, and that is refreshing compared to some of these overly complicated tools.

Wish there were more integrations with other productivity tools. Also, the model suggestions are helpful but not always spot-on for niche use cases.

This is used every day for composing client emails and brainstorming copy angles. Switching between models in the middle of a conversation means that different perspectives are being presented without having to manage multiple browser tabs. Just what the workflow needed.

Having gpt-4, claude opus, and gemini all in one interface is a huge time-saver. The model switching is instantaneous, and the interface is keeping everything organized and not at all cluttered or overwhelming.

The model availability indicators could be a bit more prominent on smaller screens. Hard to notice them when rapidly switching between tasks.