Use AI Reviews

didn't expect much when i started the trial but use AI has become my go-to for everything from meeting notes to email drafts - the speed is incredible and the ability to switch between GPT-4 and Claude based on the task makes a huge difference in the quality of the output.

makes my job a lot easier, especially during conference season. speedy and very easy to switch models.

it's worth mentioning that there's some getting used to with the interface, and i have not totally gotten used to all of it, as well as having wished that there was more customization with the notifications, as they can be distracting.

I've been using it for two weeks now in order to generate some materials for my lesson plan and research. Satisfactory, does exactly what it claims to do although with several UI improvements.

Model selection by task is a smart concept, and having access to 30+ models from one dashboard is convenient. Results are generally fast, and comparing outputs between providers works well for most tasks.

Some advanced reasoning models felt slower to respond than expected. Not sure if that's a provider-side issue, but adding estimated response times per model would help set expectations better.

Document writing is a lot faster now that AI workspace functionality is centralized. This means I can draft something in one model, edit it in another, and get feedback on the third without losing any of my work along the way. The visual and multimodal support serves my needs with charts and diagrams well. Support for 30+ languages means I can work with international clients easily.

Cannot even think of reverting to single-model tools anymore. This has really enhanced the quality of my deliverables and client presentations.

Mobile app lacks some desktop features, which is a problem when traveling. Sometimes the models contradict each other and you have to use your judgment. Also wish there was better team collaboration functionality available natively.

Talking with international suppliers used to require using a translator and then fixing the output. Now it all happens in one chat, the text looks natural, and the responses are fast enough to use in a chat.

Tested translations in French, Portuguese, and Korean and the outputs read like they were written by a native speaker. The 30+ language support is not just a feature checkbox here, the quality actually holds up under real use.

There's no auto-detect for the input language. Having to specify the language of the text before translation is an unnecessary step that could easily be done automatically.

Created an entire email campaign for a product launch through this tool. Analyzing the output between gpt-4 and claude allowed me to incorporate persuasion techniques from one and the structure from the other 😊

Running prompts through multiple models and comparing tone, structure, and creativity side by side produces stronger drafts than relying on any single model. Fast switching makes iterating on ideas feel fluid.

An integrated style guide or tone picker feature would be a great addition. Currently, you need to input the tone every time you prompt, which can become tedious if you are working on a set of related content.

I appreciate the simplicity of these tools. This one does what it says on the tin: it gives you access to multiple AI models in one clean workspace. I use it for writing my blog posts and summarizing research articles.

The united assistant interface is Minimalist to perfection. You are not hit with a bunch of unnecessary information and difficult menus to navigate through.

It could use more organization tools, like the ability to bookmark or categorize messages. Search is simplistic and could be more robust, especially in a situation where the individual has a lot of chat history.

I have been compiling research updates every week for my team members and doing so with this tool has made it much easier. Running papers through both claude opus and gpt-4 models has been beneficial.

Running complex prompts through advanced reasoning models produces thorough, well-structured summaries. Being able to compare how different models interpret dense material helps surface insights that one model alone might miss.

Being able to export the summary to external file formats such as PDF or Markdown would be a welcome feature. Currently, the process requires copy and paste into external applications, which is somewhat cumbersome.

I use this daily for meeting notes, translations, and marketing content. Being able to switch from deepseek for reasoning tasks to gpt-4 for creative writing without opening new tabs is incredibly convenient.

No more juggling separate subscriptions to ChatGPT, Claude, and other platforms. The centralized AI workspace brings everything together in a way that actually makes sense. Model selection by task helps when you're not sure which AI is best for a particular job.

Occasionally a model will be listed as available but then time out. The mobile experience could use some work – it's functional but not as smooth as the desktop version.

It is a good tool that I have been using for coding help and research. There are some tangles in the interface, but the functionality is definitely on target.

It is very helpful to have gpt-4 and deepseek in the same workspace. The switching between models is quick, and the interface helps to keep everything straight.

The interface can be a bit squished on smaller monitors, which can be annoying.

I started using this tool to take notes at my weekly team meetings, and it has proven indispensable. Raw notes can be fed into gemini for cleaning up, followed by the selection of claude for action items.

Voice commands combined with fast transcription have made taking notes during meetings quite easy. The summary generated by all models is good, and switching to other models for action items ensures accuracy.

The microphone sensitivity options need to be fine-tuned. The technology works perfectly in quiet surroundings, but in some noisy surroundings, there might be instances where noise from the surroundings interferes with transcription.

Morning commute time has been repurposed as work time. Voice dictation makes it easy to get ideas and rough drafts done in the car. When the desk is reached, everything is already in the chat and ready to go. Practical and genuinely time-efficient.

Voice commands for dictation work surprisingly well. Spoke the text of the paragraph above, and it was transcribed correctly with punctuation. The combination of this feature with model selection makes the morning routine a hands-free affair.

One feature missing from voice commands currently is the ability to switch models by name. The ability to say "use Claude" instead of clicking the selector would complete the experience.

It's useful for writing product descriptions and customer emails, though I wish it was a bit cheaper for casual use.

Us AI gives me access to models I wouldn't normally pay for separately, which is great for comparison. The transition between service providers is seamless, and I was able to grasp the UI as it is not overly complicated.

The pricing seems a bit steep for me when I'm not using it very often. Some of the latest models also load a bit slower than others, and the absence of templates for the prompts means I have to type in the instructions again and again.

Been using this for a few weeks and it's exactly what I needed. No more paying for multiple subscriptions or trying to remember which AI tool I left a conversation in.

The centralized workspace idea is executed really well here. You can access gpt-4, claude, gemini, deepseek, and more without juggling tabs. The model switching is smooth and happens mid-conversation which saves a ton of time when you're comparing outputs.

Would be nice to have a dark mode toggle that's easier to find. Also, occasionally some models take a bit longer to load than others, though it's not a huge issue.

Used Use AI to plan and write a pitch. All the pieces remained together in one space, making it a breeze to collaborate.

Having the ability to brainstorm, write, and summarize in one application saved me app-switching time.

A calendar integration would make it even more useful for project planning.

I conserved time during a brainstorming session by not having to start again when I wanted a second perspective from another model.

Switching back and forth between OpenAI and Anthropic models during the middle of a discussion was seamless and immediate.

Perhaps display estimated token price before switching to a more costly model.

It is an excellent writing companion because it leverages the strengths of different AIs. Faster writing processes are ensured with higher-quality output. A must-try for any serious writer.

As a writer, this tool is a dream. I use the model selection by task for everything from outlining a document with one model to polishing the prose with another. The centralized workspace keeps all my drafts and ideas in one place, which has dramatically improved my writing workflow.

The word count or token usage is not always as transparent as it could be. Many times, I feel like I am estimating how much of my quota any given, long conversation has used up.

I have employed it as an instrument for writing summaries and it works well, but there was some friction with exporting that delayed my end-stage process.

It has advanced reasoning models that tackle technical queries effectively and an organized research area keeps things clean and neat; it’s useful to have a live model comparison for verification.

There are constraints on functions supported for export. Also, at times, the search facility fails to trace old threads.

It is a great research companion. The ease with which I am able to compare outputs from different models, like Gemini and Claude OPUS, ensures a more rounded view. The export formatting could be neater, but it's a small price to pay.

This is my primary tool for compiling research digests. The multi-LLM access lets me cross-reference information from different AI perspectives quickly, and the centralized workspace keeps all my notes and sources organized. It's a huge time-saver and improves the depth of my research.

The formatting of exported text can sometimes be a little irregular and requires cleaning up in an external document editor. It is a small annoyance, but one I regularly encounter while working.

Processed my writing tasks here for a week. Productivity was indeed enhanced and the learning curve wasn't drastic.

Interface is easy enough for beginners but deep enough for complex workflows, striking a great balance between simplicity and control.

Could include drag-and-drop chat organization for power users.

It took me a few sessions to feel comfortable, but once things clicked, it became useful. I still think onboarding could be smoother for people new to AI tools.

The platform offers a lot of flexibility through multi-llm access and live model comparison, which is great once understood. Productivity improved after a few days of regular use.

At first, the number of options felt overwhelming. The interface could guide beginners better, and some features felt tucked away rather than obvious.